<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Collaborative editing of source code</title>
	<link>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Grand Fallacy &#187; The silver lining.</title>
		<link>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>The Grand Fallacy &#187; The silver lining.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>[...] This looks fascinating and exciting to me &#8212; collaboration across tools and systems using D-Bus and telepathy. It would be nice to see some sort of XML &#8220;exploder/imploder&#8221; that would allow OpenOffice.org documents to benefit from this approach too. (I&#8217;ve often wondered why, with the open formats we champion, that hasn&#8217;t been done yet.) But hey, even text files would be a big step forward. Good luck with this Alban, it looks like a superb idea and long overdue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This looks fascinating and exciting to me &#8212; collaboration across tools and systems using D-Bus and telepathy. It would be nice to see some sort of XML &#8220;exploder/imploder&#8221; that would allow OpenOffice.org documents to benefit from this approach too. (I&#8217;ve often wondered why, with the open formats we champion, that hasn&#8217;t been done yet.) But hey, even text files would be a big step forward. Good luck with this Alban, it looks like a superb idea and long overdue. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Stanford &#187; Wanted: obby plugin for Gedit</title>
		<link>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Stanford &#187; Wanted: obby plugin for Gedit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>[...] the fun features of Gedit while still retaining the collaboration activities that gobby provides.  Alban has a prototype up using dbus which allows collaborative activities using editors of choice (in his example, VIM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the fun features of Gedit while still retaining the collaboration activities that gobby provides.  Alban has a prototype up using dbus which allows collaborative activities using editors of choice (in his example, VIM [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1498</guid>
		<description>This would be amazing to have. GObby lacks out on the Telepathy, but is a mean deal otherwise. I saw your post about an DBus interface for Vim, now that would be a godsend to anyone wanting to embed vim (like myself). I'd like to see if I could you help out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be amazing to have. GObby lacks out on the Telepathy, but is a mean deal otherwise. I saw your post about an DBus interface for Vim, now that would be a godsend to anyone wanting to embed vim (like myself). I&#8217;d like to see if I could you help out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>The D-Bus specification speaks about the org.freedesktop.TextEditor interface. Unfortunately, it isn't specified in detail.

Kate's D-Bus interface org.kde.KTextEditor.Document seems to be the best starting point, see . Collaborative working isn't the focus there, though.

I have some vague ideas for adding such an D-Bus interface to GNU Emacs, but I haven't started yet. Maybe we could join our efforts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The D-Bus specification speaks about the org.freedesktop.TextEditor interface. Unfortunately, it isn&#8217;t specified in detail.</p>
<p>Kate&#8217;s D-Bus interface org.kde.KTextEditor.Document seems to be the best starting point, see . Collaborative working isn&#8217;t the focus there, though.</p>
<p>I have some vague ideas for adding such an D-Bus interface to GNU Emacs, but I haven&#8217;t started yet. Maybe we could join our efforts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rektide</title>
		<link>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>rektide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>Obby protocol is documented.  http://gobby.0x539.de/trac/wiki/ObbyProtocol has some stuff.  Supposedly they were working on a revamp; I suggest contacting them directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obby protocol is documented.  <a href="http://gobby.0x539.de/trac/wiki/ObbyProtocol" rel="nofollow">http://gobby.0&#215;539.de/trac/wiki/ObbyProtocol</a> has some stuff.  Supposedly they were working on a revamp; I suggest contacting them directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gah</title>
		<link>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>gah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>Emacs 23 has dbus bindings. So it's just a bit of lisp that needs written...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emacs 23 has dbus bindings. So it&#8217;s just a bit of lisp that needs written&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillaume</title>
		<link>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillaume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 17:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>Awesome!
Can't wait to see this properly integrated into GNOME and Empathy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome!<br />
Can&#8217;t wait to see this properly integrated into GNOME and Empathy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alban</title>
		<link>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>Alban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>Is the Gobby's protocol and algorithms explained somewhere?

I found your post interesting:
http://typo.cdlm.fasmz.org/articles/2007/04/24/collaborative-development
I didn't know GNU Emacs has an implementation of the Gobby protocol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the Gobby&#8217;s protocol and algorithms explained somewhere?</p>
<p>I found your post interesting:<br />
<a href="http://typo.cdlm.fasmz.org/articles/2007/04/24/collaborative-development" rel="nofollow">http://typo.cdlm.fasmz.org/articles/2007/04/24/collaborative-development</a><br />
I didn&#8217;t know GNU Emacs has an implementation of the Gobby protocol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien</title>
		<link>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 15:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>Gobby's code is reusable and handles all the conflict resolving and network stuff. Then you would simply need to translate your editor's text commands into Obby commands, and a means of updating the buffer with remote changes. I'm not sure how much of this is doable as a pure editor plugin, without patching vim or emacs itself…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gobby&#8217;s code is reusable and handles all the conflict resolving and network stuff. Then you would simply need to translate your editor&#8217;s text commands into Obby commands, and a means of updating the buffer with remote changes. I&#8217;m not sure how much of this is doable as a pure editor plugin, without patching vim or emacs itself…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 15:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://alban.apinc.org/blog/2008/05/11/collaborative-edition-of-source-code/#comment-1479</guid>
		<description>This looks really cool!  Can't wait to try it out.

BTW, just to be nitpicky...the word you're looking for is "editing", not "edition".  I was very confused when I saw your post's title show up in my feed reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks really cool!  Can&#8217;t wait to try it out.</p>
<p>BTW, just to be nitpicky&#8230;the word you&#8217;re looking for is &#8220;editing&#8221;, not &#8220;edition&#8221;.  I was very confused when I saw your post&#8217;s title show up in my feed reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
